<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO-DNS &#187; hacker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seo-dns.com/en/tag/hacker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seo-dns.com/en</link>
	<description>Welcome SEO-DNS.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 09:50:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<meta xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
		<item>
		<title>Top Ten tech fails of 2009!</title>
		<link>http://seo-dns.com/en/top-ten-tech-fails-of-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://seo-dns.com/en/top-ten-tech-fails-of-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[account]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conficker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Wave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LiveJournal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mashable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[member]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechCrunch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worldwide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zune]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo-dns.com/en/?p=3373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It was a big year for technology: Twitter and Facebook&#8217;s popularity exploded, while new smartphones, e-readers and a host of other gadgets cropped up to compete for our plugged-in affection. 
But into each electronic life a little digital rain must fall.
We polled a handful of the most tech-savvy folks we know for their thoughts on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://seo-dns.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/twitter_fail.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-3374" title="twitter_fail" src="http://seo-dns.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/twitter_fail-300x225.jpg" alt="twitter_fail" width="300" height="225" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #808000;"><strong>It was a big year for technology: Twitter and Facebook&#8217;s popularity exploded, while new smartphones, e-readers and a host of other gadgets cropped up to compete for our plugged-in affection. <span id="more-3373"></span></strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">But into each electronic life a little digital rain must fall.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">We polled a handful of the most tech-savvy folks we know for their thoughts on the worst moments in <strong>technology</strong> from <strong>2009</strong> &#8212; the most epic &#8220;<strong>fails</strong>&#8221; of the year.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">And now, in no particular order, our <strong>2009 Tech Fails</strong> &#8230;</p>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #808000;"><strong>Y2-what? Zune gets off to a bad start</strong></span></h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Technically it was a New Year&#8217;s Eve surprise. But many owners of <strong>Microsoft&#8217;s Zune media</strong> player started <strong>2009</strong> with little more than a paperweight with LED lights.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">At midnight on December 31, all Zune&#8217;s 30-GB MP3 players froze up. <strong>Microsoft</strong> explained the problem as a problem with the way the device&#8217;s internal clock recognized (or didn&#8217;t recognize) leap years.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The glitch only lasted a day, but didn&#8217;t help a device that was already failing to gain ground on Apple&#8217;s <strong>iPod</strong>.</p>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #808000;"><strong>TwitterPeek</strong> <strong>fails to pique interest</strong></span></h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The reaction of many in the tech community to the release of the <strong>TwitterPeek</strong> device was a collective, &#8220;Huh?&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Sure, there are some people who don&#8217;t have <strong>smartphones</strong> and don&#8217;t want to pay for expensive mobile plans. But is there really a market for a $199 device that does nothing but let you manage your <strong>Twitter</strong> feed?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">&#8220;I already have a $200 device to update <strong>Twitter</strong>,&#8221; said one techie we spoke to. &#8220;It&#8217;s called my <strong>iPhone</strong>.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The folks at Peek, makers of <strong>TwitterPeek</strong>, had already made the Pronto &#8212; a device that handled only texts and e-mails. Maybe a combination of the two gadgets is in the works. But even then, would enough people be interested? Probably not.</p>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #808000;"><strong>Facebook backtracks on owning your stuff</strong></span></h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OK &#8230; so every time <strong>Facebook </strong>makes even the most minute changes, it sparks an outcry among its 350 million members, not to mention (irony alert) dozens of new <strong>Facebook </strong>groups geared at making the <strong>site</strong> change back.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">But a terms-of-service change in February went further, implying that <strong>Facebook </strong>owned the rights to anything users uploaded to the <strong>site</strong>. Another change suggested that <strong>Facebook </strong>held those rights forever, even if people quit the <strong>site </strong>or took the material down.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Facebook </strong>responded that it simply needed those rights to be able to post information to other <strong>users</strong>. But when the backlash continued, the <strong>site </strong>eventually switched the terms back to their former wording.</p>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #808000;"><strong>Sidekick punts user info</strong></span></h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In what one observer called &#8220;an almost incomprehensible data disaster,&#8221; T-Mobile told users in October that a server error at a <strong>Microsoft </strong>subsidiary had lost <strong>users</strong>&#8216; personal data it had stored for the devices.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">All of it.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Phone </strong>numbers, contact lists, calendars and other information was gone &#8212; and even new data would disappear if <strong>users </strong>turned off or recharged the <strong>phone</strong>.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Users </strong>were offered free <strong>service </strong>and rebates in the wake of the mess, as T-Mobile scrambled to recover what little of the data it could. But that didn&#8217;t stop the lawsuits, <strong>Internet </strong>griping and ill will generated by the snafu.</p>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #808000;"><strong>Hacking Twitter</strong></span></h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">It started as a story about someone <strong>hacking </strong>the accounts of several <strong>Twitter </strong>employees. Then, after <strong>Twitter </strong>said the attack was limited to personal <strong>information</strong>, not sensitive, company-related stuff, the <strong>hacker </strong>behind the attack struck again &#8212; in a different way.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">He sent 310 documents to leading technology blog <strong>TechCrunch</strong>. The <strong>blog </strong>published a small portion of them and sent the documents to <strong>Twitter</strong>, which is when the <strong>company </strong>learned that they included financial projections and notes from high-level executive meetings.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Twitter </strong>responded by reportedly closing the security holes that allowed the attack.</p>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #808000;"><strong>Enough with the updates, already!</strong></span></h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This was the year that <strong>online social media</strong> exploded. That&#8217;s good news for the future of <strong>Facebook</strong>, <strong>Twitter </strong>and the like.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">But sometimes it just got to be a bit too much.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Members </strong>of Congress abandoned any pretense of paying attention to President Obama&#8217;s State of the Union speech by updating their <strong>Twitter </strong>feeds as he was speaking.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">There was the groom who updated his <strong>Facebook </strong>relationship status at the altar. And the women who <strong>tweeted </strong>during childbirth. [In fairness, the most high-profile <strong>tweeting </strong>new mom was Sara Williams, wife of <strong>Twitter </strong>CEO Evan Williams].</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">And that&#8217;s not even mentioning all those friend requests you got from your grade-school teachers and <strong>members </strong>of your mom&#8217;s knitting circle.</p>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #808000;"><strong>Hyped-up Conficker fails</strong></span></h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This is a failure we&#8217;re glad to report.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The <strong>Conficker </strong>worm was, by all <strong>accounts</strong>, a serious bit of malware that infected as many as 10 million <strong>computers worldwide</strong>. Instead of <strong>attacking </strong>those <strong>computers</strong>, it was designed to control them, paving the way for later <strong>attacks</strong>.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">When researchers spotted the date April 1 in the worm&#8217;s coding, speculation began mounting that a major April Fools&#8217; Day <strong>attack </strong>was on its way. Instead, it was mostly quiet &#8212; a false alarm of Y2K proportions.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">&#8220;I think the joke&#8217;s on us a little bit, which you would have expected, having an April 1 date,&#8221; Holly Stewart, threat response manager for IBM&#8217;s X-Force, a <strong>computer </strong>security service, said at the time.</p>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #808000;"><strong>Attacks cripple Twitter, Facebook</strong></span></h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">On August 6, the concept of <strong>computer </strong>addiction didn&#8217;t seem so silly.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A massive denial-of-service <strong>attack </strong>hit <strong>Twitter</strong>, <strong>Facebook </strong>and the <strong>LiveJournal</strong> <strong>blogging site</strong>. <strong>Twitter </strong>was by far the hardest hit, completely blacking out for several hours.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The <strong>attacks </strong>were believed to have targeted a <strong>blogger </strong>in the country of Georgia who had been critical of <a href="http://seo-dns.com/en/sem/seo/eastern-europe/russia/" target="_blank">Russia</a>. The attacks, the <strong>blogger </strong>said, coincided with the one-year anniversary of renewed violence between the two countries.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">What was telling was how freaked out people became. <strong>Users </strong>described feeling naked, jittery and upset without the ability to post on <strong>Twitter</strong>. When the <strong>site </strong>came back up, the top topic of conversation was the hashtag for &#8220;When <strong>Twitter </strong>Was Down.&#8221;</p>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #808000;"><strong>Gmail crashes</strong></span></h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">We heard some<strong> </strong>different views<strong> </strong>on this year&#8217;s string of outages or slowdowns of <strong>Google&#8217;s</strong> popular <strong>e-mail</strong> system.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Some thought coverage was overblown.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">But as more computing power moves &#8220;into the cloud,&#8221; people and businesses are relying on programs like <strong>Gmail </strong>not just for <strong>e-mails</strong>, but to archive documents, chat with friends or co-workers and store contact <strong>information</strong>.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Gmail </strong>went through several high-profile crashes in <strong>2009</strong>, including one in February and two in September. While <strong>e-mail</strong> crashes are nothing new to any provider, <strong>2009</strong>&#8217;s were the first since <strong>Google</strong> begain offering offline support.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Response to the crashes simultaneously showed how many people depend on <strong>Gmail </strong>and how easy it is to make fun of those people. <strong>Social-networking blog Mashable</strong> responded with a list of five things to do while <strong>Gmail </strong>is down (No. 1: &#8220;Immediately flood <strong>Twitter </strong>with <strong>tweets </strong>alternately proclaiming, &#8216;<strong>Gmail </strong>is down!&#8217; and inquiring, &#8216;Is <strong>Gmail </strong>down?&#8217; &#8220;)</p>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #808000;"><strong>I got Google Wave &#8212; now what?</strong></span></h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">OK, so it&#8217;s a little early in the game to call this one a total fail. But after the breathless anticipation that greeted <strong>Google Wave</strong> and the hot rush to get an invitation for its beta testing, lots of users found themselves asking, &#8220;OK &#8230; now what?&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Google</strong>, for its part, released an 80-minute tutorial video &#8212; leading some observers to argue that if you need an hour and 20 minutes to explain what your product does, you might be in trouble.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">It&#8217;s designed as a platform to allow <strong>users </strong>to communicate and collaborate in real time &#8212; a tool some predict will be used effectively by developers in the future.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">But for now, it&#8217;s inspired the creation of a <strong>Web site</strong> &#8212; Easier to Understand Than <strong>Wave</strong> &#8212; on which <strong>users </strong>compare the <strong>online </strong>tool to other sometimes obtuse subjects (Both Ozzy Osbourne and the geopolitical climate of Southeast Asia are easier to understand than <strong>Wave</strong>, users voted, while Sarah Palin and Scientology are both more difficult).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>www.cnn.com</em></p>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fseo-dns.com%2Fen%2Ftop-ten-tech-fails-of-2009%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fseo-dns.com%2Fen%2Ftop-ten-tech-fails-of-2009%2F&amp;source=seodns&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://seo-dns.com/en/top-ten-tech-fails-of-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
